Relationship to other systems and protocols
This page clarifies the relationship between PoCC and other systems, frameworks, and protocols. It is designed to prevent conceptual confusion and establish clear boundaries.
| Dimension | PoC | PoCC |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Individual cognition | Multi-agent collaboration |
| Focus | Cognitive validity | Interaction accountability |
| Unit of Analysis | Reasoning process | Agent action |
| Output | Cognitive validation | Action log + dependency graph |
| Revision Handling | Implicit | Explicit and recorded |
| Layer | Verification primitive | Collaboration protocol |
PoC verifies cognition. PoCC commits cognition.
PoC may exist without PoCC. PoCC may reference PoC as a verification primitive, but does not require it.
PoCC is not an alignment framework.
| Dimension | AI Alignment | PoCC |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Concern | What agents should want | What agents actually did |
| Goal | Ensure beneficial outcomes | Ensure auditable processes |
| Evaluation Criteria | Value alignment, safety | Action validity, traceability |
| Approach | Normative (prescriptive) | Structural (descriptive) |
Alignment concerns objectives. PoCC concerns accountability.
PoCC can serve as infrastructure for alignment research by providing auditable records of agent behavior, but it does not itself solve the alignment problem.
| Dimension | Reputation Systems | PoCC |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Output | Trust scores, rankings | Action logs, dependency graphs |
| Evaluation | Aggregate judgments | Individual action validity |
| Subjectivity | Often subjective (ratings) | Objective (cryptographic verification) |
| Gaming Resistance | Vulnerable to Sybil attacks | Sybil-agnostic at protocol layer |
Reputation systems aggregate opinions about agents. PoCC records what agents actually did.
PoCC can serve as a foundation for reputation systems by providing verifiable data, but PoCC itself does not compute reputation scores.
| Dimension | DAO Governance | PoCC |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Collective decision-making | Action accountability |
| Mechanism | Voting, proposals, execution | Action logging, verification |
| Authority Source | Token holdings, delegation | Agent signatures |
| Scope | Governance-specific | General-purpose collaboration |
DAOs make decisions. PoCC records actions.
PoCC can serve as infrastructure for DAO operations by providing auditable records of proposals, votes, and executions, but PoCC is governance-neutral.
| Feature | PoW/PoS | PoCC |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Resource | Computation or capital | None (action validity) |
| Goal | Agreement on state | Accountability for actions |
| Agent-Native | No | Yes |
| Cognition-Aware | No | Yes (if integrated with PoC) |
Traditional consensus mechanisms achieve agreement through resource expenditure. PoCC achieves accountability through cryptographic verification of actions.
PoCC is not an agent framework (e.g., AutoGPT, LangChain, CrewAI).
| Dimension | Agent Frameworks | PoCC |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Build and run agents | Record agent interactions |
| Scope | Agent implementation | Collaboration protocol |
| Relationship | Implementation layer | Interaction layer |
Agent frameworks create agents. PoCC governs how agents collaborate.
Agent frameworks can implement PoCC-compliance to enable interoperability and accountability across different agent systems.
PoCC can serve as infrastructure for:
In all cases, PoCC remains a neutral substrate, not a complete solution.